A private roll-up buys with debt, seller notes and investor cash and realizes the gap between small-company and platform multiples only when it sells or refinances. A public roll-up can also pay sellers in stock and raise capital continuously, and the market may value the whole platform at a higher multiple, but it pays the ongoing cost of being public and dilutes owners whenever it issues shares. GF Data's 2024 medians show the spread: 4.5x EBITDA for $1–10M deals, 6.5x for $10–100M and 9.0x for $100–500M. The public math works only if your stock trades at a clearly higher multiple than you pay and you issue shares with discipline.
A private roll-up buys small companies at small-company multiples. Over time, the combined company is large enough to be valued at a higher one. The difference is the value created, before any growth.
GF Data's 2024 median EBITDA multiples by deal size show the steps:
The private owner sees this value on paper only. It becomes cash when the company is sold, recapitalized or refinanced. Until then, acquisitions are funded with SBA or bank debt, seller notes and investor equity. Each new deal needs new cash.
A public company has a market price every day. If that price reflects a higher multiple than the targets cost, the company can use its shares as currency. It can pay a seller partly in stock, or sell stock to raise cash for the next deal.
An academic study of more than 6,000 IPO registrations from 1990 to 2024 found that completing an IPO raises a firm's annual probability of making an acquisition by about 12 percentage points. About three-quarters of the extra deals were at least partly paid in stock. So being public changes how much a company buys and how it pays.
The same study found that, among newly public firms, stock-paid deals underperform cash deals by 20–30 percentage points over 3–5 years and are about 50% more likely to end in delisting. The currency is real. So is the risk of spending it badly.
Inputs are illustrative. The purchase multiple uses GF Data's 4.5x median for $1–10M deals. The 10x platform multiple is the site's illustrative figure, not a forecast.
Case 1: private, paid with cash and debt
Case 2: public, stock valued at 10x
Case 3: public, stock valued at 5x
The lesson is the spread. Stock is a good currency only when your multiple is well above what you pay. Before comparing, subtract the ongoing cost of being public from EBITDA. Every recurring dollar of cost is multiplied by your valuation multiple.
Castellum, listed on NYSE American, paid more than 80% of a roughly $6.6M acquisition in restricted stock. Its share count rose from about 53M to about 94.6M between March 2024 and March 2026. That is 94.6 / 53 = about 1.78 times as many shares. An investor who owned 1% in March 2024 and bought no more would own about 0.56% two years later.
Dilution is not wrong in itself. It is wrong when the earnings bought per new share are lower than the earnings each existing share already had.
My view is that most buyers should stay private. For the costs of listing and staying listed, see PublicFinancial on ongoing public-company costs.
Where these numbers come from: Multiples by deal size are GF Data 2024 medians reported by Carry and Conquer. Acquisition rates and stock-paid deal performance are from the study reported on the CLS Blue Sky Blog. Castellum figures are from this case review. The 10x platform multiple and share counts in the worked comparison are illustrative.
Yes, but private stock is harder for a seller to value and to sell. Sellers usually want more cash or better terms to accept it. Securities rules apply either way, so involve counsel.
No. Small public companies can trade at low multiples, especially with thin trading or weak earnings. If your stock trades near or below what you pay for businesses, stock deals destroy value.
Model both with your real numbers: purchase multiples, debt cost, the cost of being public and a range of trading multiples, including a low one. If the public case only wins at a high multiple, stay private.
The math assumes being public helps you buy. The evidence on that is mixed: does being public actually help a company make acquisitions?
Meraki Dealmakers is a service of Meraki Partners, LLC, an advisory firm. It is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, business broker, law firm or accounting firm. This article is general information, not legal, tax or investment advice.
Start with the playbook. The first conversation is free.
Meraki Dealmakers is a service of Meraki Partners, LLC.
Meraki Partners, LLC is an advisory firm. It is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, business broker, law firm or accounting firm, and does not solicit investors or receive compensation based on capital raised.
© 2026 Meraki Partners, LLC