Yes, if it meets the test for its business type. As of October 2026, TSX Venture Exchange Policy 2.1 (as at March 31, 2026) sets the Tier 2 industrial, technology or life sciences test at one of C$750,000 of net tangible assets, C$500,000 of revenue or C$2,000,000 of arm's-length financing, plus 12 months at the commercialization stage, a public float of 500,000 shares, 200 public shareholders and 20% public ownership. Cassels and DLA Piper report that the TSXV removed Policy 2.2 and its sponsor requirement on March 31, 2026. My view is that Canadian acquirers start there because the entry numbers sit far below Nasdaq's $15 million float test, not because the process is light: escrow, reporting and Canadian securities law still apply.
Yes. The TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV) has no holding company category. It places an applicant in a segment by what the business does and tests it against the Tier 1 or Tier 2 numbers in Policy 2.1, Initial Listing Requirements. The version I opened is dated as at March 31, 2026.
In my reading, a holdco that owns operating businesses is tested as an industrial issuer, and a vehicle that holds passive investments is tested as an investment issuer. Confirm the segment with exchange staff before you file.
As of October 2026, Policy 2.1 sets these Tier 2 tests. Dollar amounts are Canadian.
Policy 2.1 uses its own defined term for arm's-length financing, so check how your raise qualifies with counsel. Tier 1 is higher: an industrial issuer needs $5,000,000 of net tangible assets or revenue, 1,000,000 float shares and 250 public shareholders.
Two changes matter to a new applicant.
The Nasdaq Capital Market asks for a $4 minimum bid price (its $3 and $2 alternatives are set to end for new listings on about October 30, 2026, when SR-NASDAQ-2026-082 becomes operative), 1,000,000 unrestricted publicly held shares, 300 round lot holders and $15 million of unrestricted publicly held shares by value. TSXV Tier 2 asks for 500,000 float shares and 200 public shareholders, and the table I opened states no dollar value for the float. The full Nasdaq rules are in Nasdaq's 2026 listing requirements for a small company.
Three public-record examples show the pattern, and each is only one company.
My view is that three features explain the pattern. The Tier 2 numbers are small. The capital pool route lets a shell with cash find the business. And a company that outgrows the TSXV can move to the TSX, as Converge did. None of this makes the process easy.
Assumptions, all hypothetical: a holdco with 8,000,000 shares held by its owners, C$2.4 million of revenue from operations running more than 12 months, and a plan to raise C$2.5 million from arm's-length buyers at C$0.50 a share.
The owners' shares would stay escrowed for 36 months. Public investors would own 38.5% of a C$6.5 million company. Whether that trade is worth it depends on the acquisitions the money funds.
Where these numbers come from: Listing tests are from TSXV Policy 2.1, Initial Listing Requirements (as at March 31, 2026), and reverse takeover terms from Policy 5.2, Changes of Business and Reverse Takeovers (as at March 31, 2026). The sponsor change is reported by Cassels and DLA Piper. Escrow terms are reported by DLA Piper and Fasken. The resale period is from the NI 45-102 Companion Policy. Company facts are from the Quisitive 2019 MD&A, the Quisitive H.I.G. release, the Converge release and the Constellation release. The worked example is hypothetical.
Cassels and DLA Piper report that it does not, since March 31, 2026. Existing sponsor contracts are a separate matter to review with counsel.
Yes. Converge's release shows one did, with TSX trading starting February 11, 2021. The company must meet TSX standards, so check them first.
The Policy 2.1 text I opened does not bar it. Ask exchange staff what extra review applies to your facts. Canadian securities law still governs the process, so ask Canadian counsel.
If you are weighing a shell instead of a new listing, read how a roll-up goes public through a reverse takeover or shell.
Meraki Dealmakers is a service of Meraki Partners, LLC, an advisory firm. It is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, business broker, law firm or accounting firm. This article is general information, not legal, tax or investment advice.
Start with the playbook. The first conversation is free.
Meraki Dealmakers is a service of Meraki Partners, LLC.
Meraki Partners, LLC is an advisory firm. It is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, business broker, law firm or accounting firm, and does not solicit investors or receive compensation based on capital raised.
© 2026 Meraki Partners, LLC